All brands
Head-to-head

PlanToys vs Ethical Consumer

An independent side-by-side comparison of PlanToys and Ethical Consumer across certifications, average sustainability score and product range.

PlanToys

92/100 avg score

2 products tracked

Certifications

FSC CertifiedCruelty-FreeEWG Verified
View PlanToys profile →

Ethical Consumer

Higher score

97/100 avg score

2 products tracked

Certifications

B CorpFSC CertifiedVegan
View Ethical Consumer profile →

Top PlanToys products

PlanToys Wooden Dancing Alligator Pull Toy
74
Brand
92
FSC CertifiedCruelty-Free
4.7 (4,500)

A classic wooden pull toy made from sustainable PlanWood and chemical-free rubberwood. Features a charming clicking sound to encourage walking.

PlanToys Creative Play Dough Tools
74
Brand
92
FSC CertifiedEWG Verified
4.7 (842)

A high-quality, sustainable play set made from PlanWood (recycled rubberwood sawdust) and water-based dyes, designed to foster creativity in young children without the use of plastics or animal-derived finishes.

Top Ethical Consumer products

The Ethical Consumer Magazine Subscription
76
Brand
98
B CorpFSC Certified
4.8 (850)

The Ethical Consumer Magazine by Ethical Consumer is the definitive UK guide to conscious shopping, featuring deep-dive brand ratings and corporate transparency reports.

The Ethical Consumer Guide: Simple ways to save the planet
75
Brand
96
FSC CertifiedVegan
4.8 (124)

An essential UK-focused manual for sustainable living, printed on 100% recycled paper using vegetable-based inks.

Frequently asked: PlanToys vs Ethical Consumer

Which is more ethical, PlanToys or Ethical Consumer?+

Ethical Consumer scores higher on independent Pickly scoring: PlanToys averages 92/100 vs Ethical Consumer at 97/100.

Which has more certifications?+

PlanToys appears with 3 verified certifications (FSC Certified, Cruelty-Free, EWG Verified). Ethical Consumer appears with 3 (B Corp, FSC Certified, Vegan).

Are these scores independent?+

Yes. Both brands are scored by the same methodology — never paid placement. See our methodology page for the weighting.